Reasons Why Wine-Tasting Is a Bit of a Hoax

Updated on August 29, 2018
Rupert Taylor profile image

I've spent half a century (yikes) writing for radio and print—mostly print. I hope to be still tapping the keys as I take my last breath.

Source

The hallowed ritual begins as the sommelier pours the precious liquid into a glass. The wine snob holds it up to the light and swirls it around declaring it to have good legs. It must be swirled the connoisseur declares so the wine can breathe.

Next the bouquet (smell to the rest of us). There are ancient sacraments to be honoured. The glass is not to be grabbed by the bowl as we among the great unwashed might do. No, the goblet must be picked up by the base and held between the thumb and two forefingers.

The more theatrical aficionados of the fermented grape juice will waft the delicate scents towards the nostrils and announce something like “Ah, new-mown hay with a hint of almond. There may be something of a Bach fugue in the background.”

Then comes the really serious stuff. A sip is taken and the eyes close. The mouth and cheeks move in a chewing motion as the wine is sucked through the teeth.

The assembled company hangs on the pronouncement: “Very complex. I’m getting notes of gooseberry, lavender, and caramel. The mid-palate is amused by the wine’s insouciance and there’s a slightly impertinent corrugated iron finish.”

Sceptics might be excused for wondering if they have just witnessed the setting of a new world long-distance record in BS.

Pompous Wine Quotes

Justin Howard-Sneyd, a wine expert dishes out a little perspective. “Describing wine is not an exact science; wine and taste are very personal, very subjective things. We have probably been guilty ourselves of using overblown language in the past …” No kidding.

Herewith, the black belts in flowery descriptions:

  • “The 2005 Brunello di Montalcino is a model of weightless finesse (tasting of) dark wild cherries, minerals, menthol, and spices.” Antonio Galloni
  • It is like “… a girl of fifteen, with laughing blue eyes.” - André Simon

Source

In 2013, The Broward Palm Beach New Times held a contest for over-the-top wine descriptions. And, the winner was: “Yo... did you check that Boonesfarm vintage Y2K? That was dope! It was big and bright with the complexity of Kool Aid! It was jammy like a PBJ without those earthy tannins! You hear what I’m saying?”

And, The Economist offers some pithy commentary on the typical vocabulary of oenophiles: “… self-styled connoisseurs begin spouting attributes like ‘graphite’ (which does not smell or - if nibbling pencil ends is any guide - taste of anything), ‘zesty mineral’ (how it differs from plain mineral is anyone’s guess), ‘angular’ (huh?), or ‘dumb’ (indeed).”


Is it Peasant Plonk or Something Special?

Professional wine experts don’t usually submit to blind taste tests. They know they are trading in a rich line of malarkey and would rather keep the secret tightly held within the confines of the priesthood to which they belong.

However, in between 2005 and 2013, California winemaker Robert Hodgson caught several of them out. He organized a series of tastings at the California State Fair. The Observer describes the judges as a “who’s who of the American wine industry from winemakers, sommeliers, critics and buyers to wine consultants and academics.”

And, how did they do?

“Over the years, he (Robert Hodgson) has shown again and again that even trained, professional palates are terrible at judging wine.”

Price Doesn’t Equal Quality

We don’t just have to take Robert Hodgson’s word for it. A group of academics at the University of Minnesota held more than 6,000 blind tastings. They found that “the correlation between price and overall rating is small and negative, suggesting that individuals on average enjoy more expensive wines slightly less.”

But, here’s the bit the wine snobs will cling to with eager hands: “For individuals with wine training, however, we find indications of a positive relationship between price and enjoyment.”

And, now for the summing up: “Our results indicate that both the prices of wines and wine recommendations by experts may be poor guides for non-expert wine consumers.”

Hardly a ringing endorsement of the dark arts of wine snobbery.

Source

Frédéric Brochet of the University of Bordeaux did a test in 2001. He presented the same wine to 57 volunteers a week apart. In one test, the wine was labelled as a basic table wine; in the second go it carried the label of an expensive, superior vintage.

The critics were fooled into describing the same wine positively when it came out of a high-end bottle and negatively when they thought is was a vin ordinaire.

Similarly, M. Brochet pranked 54 experts. None of them were able to tell that the one red and one white they were tasting was, in fact, the same wine. The white had been coloured by a flavourless and odourless dye.

Numerous other tests have turned up similar results; professionals and amateurs are equally bad at identifying and classifying wine.

Source

Bonus Factoids

In the 2004 movie Sideways, the Paul Giamatti character (Miles) announces with vehemence, and an expletive, “If anyone orders Merlot, I’m leaving, I am NOT drinking any Merlot!” In the same movie, Miles heaps praise on the complexity of Pinot Noir. It may only be coincidence, but after the release of the very popular film, sales of Merlot dropped and sales of Pinot Noir rose.

“Velvet and satin in a bottle” is how the Archbishop of Paris has described Domaine de la Romanee-Conti Romanee-Conti Grand Cru, Cote de Nuits, a Burgundy, in 1780. Today, this particular plonk goes for a little over $11,000 a bottle.

In related news, the residents of the Vatican City consume more wine per capita than any other country; ninety-nine bottles each annually.

Overheard in a back alley: “This wine tastes like runoff from a barnyard. I’ll be glad when I’ve had enough of it.”

Sources

  • “Velvety Chocolate With a Silky Ruby Finish. Pair With Shellfish.” Coco Krumme, Slate, February 23, 2011.
  • “Don’t Let’s Whine.” J.P., The Economist, March 3, 2011.
  • “Why I Hate Wine Snobs.” Peter Mayle, The Observer, November 19, 2006.
  • “Wine-tasting: it’s Junk Science.” David Derbyshire, The Observer, June 23, 2013.
  • “Do More Expensive Wines Taste Better? …” Robin Goldstein, et al, University of Minnesota Department of Applied Economics, April 2008.
  • “The Color of Odors.” Gil Morrot, University of Bordeaux, 2001.

Questions & Answers

    © 2016 Rupert Taylor

    Comments

      0 of 8192 characters used
      Post Comment

      • Dave Proctor profile image

        Dave Proctor 

        9 months ago from Alfauir, Valencia, Spain

        I was a 'wine professional' My late boss was a Confrere de Chevalier de Tastevinage de Beaune (which roughly translates as a Brother of the Order of Knights of Wine tasters of Beaune, Burgundy!).

        One day we tasted six wines (3 red and 3 white) open, made notes etc. then tasted the same wines blind -My boss achieved 2 out 6!

        Do not totally agree with all of your inferences but enjoyed the article. Cheers and Bottoms up Dave

      working

      This website uses cookies

      As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, delishably.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

      For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://delishably.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

      Show Details
      Necessary
      HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
      LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
      Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
      AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
      HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
      HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
      Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
      CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
      Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
      Features
      Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
      Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
      Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
      Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
      Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
      VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
      PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
      Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
      MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
      Marketing
      Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
      Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
      Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
      Statistics
      Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
      ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
      Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)